The Lute Part V
In which I offer some observations about the instruments themselves and how they were tuned
If someone finds out that I play the lute, it’s not uncommon to be asked: “oh…what is that?” I’ve even been asked “do you blow it?” once or twice. For non-lutenists – and especially non-musicians – distinctions between this or that lute are esoteric details.
But when one lutenist meets another and they both realize their common pastime (or obsession), often the first question that comes up is: do you play renaissance or baroque?
“There really is no one lute, and each one plays a different literature from a different era.”
Pat O’Brien (1947 – 2014)
…but first, “Medieval Lute”
The European lute repertoire accumulated over a long period of time. Although the extant historical repertoire spans roughly the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries, Europeans had already played the lute for hundreds of years before this time period.
The instrument was brought to Europe as early as the 12th century and had proliferated throughout the continent by the 14th. During this time music and technique was transmitted through the aural tradition, and no music written specifically for lute has survived.
But this hasn’t stopped luthiers from building instruments based on lutes in paintings that have survived from the early centuries of lute history, nor has it stopped contemporary lutenists from playing medieval music, in speculative attempts to recreate for modern audiences how medieval music might have sounded on the lute.
The medieval lute was a 4- or 5-course instrument, still closely related to its ancestor the oud, and played with a plectrum.
Contemporary duo Asteria perform medieval song repertoire accompanied by lute; singer and lutenist Eric Redlinger plays an instrument based on medieval iconography. Their beautiful performance notwithstanding, he uses a right-hand technique that belongs to a later era. A medieval lutenist would play with a plectrum, not the fingers, and would not have played more than one musical line as he does here.
Renaissance Lute & The Old Tuning
What is generally referred to today as the renaissance lute repertoire spans the period beginning with the tablatures Petrucci printed in Venice in 1507, and ending around the third decade of the 17th century. For most of this time, the lute was a six-course instrument with a single top string, second and third courses strung in unison, and the lowest three courses strung in octaves.
The 16th century saw an explosive growth in the repertoire for the lute in Italy, Germany, France, England, even Scotland. Lute virtuosos published their masterpieces in handsome editions and played for kings, queens, and popes. The rising middle class sought to emulate the nobility and so like them, they also engaged tutors to instruct their sons and daughters.
This was the lute’s “heyday”.
Stringing the six-course lute in octaves on the fourth, fifth, and sixth courses gave the instrument’s sound a fascinating brilliance, and this is part of the allure of the early Italian repertoire (at least for me).
Canon for two lutes by Francesco da Milano
performed by Jean-Marie Poirier & Thierry Meunier
Towards the end of the 16th century, changes in musical style and what the lutenists and lutenist-composers sought to express through their music led to the development of a darker, warmer sounding instrument that expanded the instrument’s lower register, while maintaining the bright, lyrical capabilities of the instrument’s highest courses. Luthiers built instruments with increasingly larger bodies and longer string lengths, and added extra bass courses to the instrument, one at a time: in addition to the vast repertoire for 6-course lute, extant literature exists in varying quantities for 7-course, 8-course, 9-course, and 10-course instruments. The first six courses on all of these lutes were still tuned in fourths with a single exceptional major third between the third and fourth courses. The newly-added bass strings – called diapasons – were tuned as indicated in the chart below.
Another feature of the renaissance lute towards the end of the 16th century was that some lutenists stopped tuning lower courses in octaves, instead tuning every course of the instrument in unison.
Secondly, for on your Bases, in that place which you call the sixt string, or r ut, these Bases must be both of one bignes, yet it hath been a generall custome (although not so much used any where as here in England) to set a small and a great string together, but amongst learned Musitions that custome is left, as irregular to the rules of Musicke.
~ John Dowland
A Varietie of Lute-Lessons (Robert Dowland), 1610
John Dowland (1563 – 1626) was the leading lute virtuoso and lutenist-composer of his time. He wrote somewhat derisively about those who strung their instruments in octaves, describing the ensuing effect as breaking the rules of counterpoint. Nonetheless it appears that both practices – unison and octave stringing – persisted contemporaneously with each other, and that octave stringing of diapasons continued to be a common practice for the duration of the instrument’s historical use: well into the 18th century.
Prelude by Nicholas Vallet (1618)
Tommy Johansson, 10-course lute
Most lutenists today are not likely to own a collection of lutes that is perfectly matched to every facet of the repertoire he or she plays. A common contemporary practice is for someone who plays renaissance lute to own an 8-course instrument, which will allow the player to play virtually any literature from the 16th century: the first publications for 9-course lute appeared in the first decade of the 17th century, beginning with Antoine Francisque’s Le Trésor d’Orphée (The Treasury of Orpheus), published in Paris by Pierre Ballard in 1600. Note the title nod to our mythical friend, whose name and influence keeps cropping up – not for the last time!
If a lutenist concentrates on a specific repertoire – say, pieces by the early 16th century Italian masters or the 10-course literature – then he or she may have a dedicated instrument that is more ideal for playing that music in particular. But it is not unusual for a lutenist to have as their primary or “workhorse” instrument a compromise – like an 8-course – upon which one could play music from most of the differing styles and schools of renaissance lute music with perhaps not the most authentic historical accuracy, but with a satisfying result nonetheless.
In the early 1600s lutenists in France began to experiment with alternate tunings, and ultimately abandoned the old tuning altogether, settling on a new, standard d minor tuning. Music for “French Lute” – dominated by dances in binary form for the new tuning – soon supplanted the old repertoire for solo lute music throughout the continent and England by the middle of the 17th century, and for the remainder of the lute’s historical repertoire.
Continued in Baroque Lute (coming soon)
The late Pat O’Brien describes and demonstrates the development of the lute family in this brief grand tour of lute history from a pre-concert lecture at the Vancouver Early Music Festival 2006. Thank you, Pat.
* * *
I ~ Meet the Lute
II ~ Francesco da Milano
III ~ The Medieval Lute
IV ~ Petrarch’s Lyre
V ~ Renaissance Lute
VI ~ Baroque Lute (coming soon)
iv b ~ Dowland on CD: A Survey of the Solo Lute Recordings: Part II (coming soon)